Sudan Army Withdraws from Ceasefire Negotiations in Switzerland - THENEWSGIST !
Sudan army boycotts ceasefire talks in Switzerland - THENEWSGIST .
SWITZERLAND-SUDAN-US-DIPLOMACY-CONFLICT-DEMO
Women take part to a demonstration on the opening day of Sudan ceasefire talks, in Geneva, on August 14, 2024. - US-sponsored talks on agreeing a ceasefire in the devastating conflict in Sudan kicked off in Switzerland, despite the Sudanese government staying away. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP)
Agency Report
Kindly share this story:
US-sponsored talks on securing a ceasefire in the devastating conflict in Sudan kicked off in Switzerland on Wednesday, despite the Sudanese government staying away.
War has raged since April 2023 between the Sudanese army under the country’s de facto ruler Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), led by his former deputy Mohamed Hamdan Daglo.
The talks are being convened by Tom Perriello, the US special envoy for Sudan, who said after the opening session that it was “high time for the guns to be silenced”.
The talks, which could last up to 10 days, are being held behind closed doors in an undisclosed location in Switzerland.
While the RSF delegation is taking part, the Sudanese armed forces (SAF) are unhappy with the format arranged by Washington.
“We have stressed that they have a responsibility to be there, and we’ll continue to make that clear,” State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said of the Sudanese army.
Patel, speaking to reporters in Washington, said that the United States felt it needed to do all it can to address “one of the most dire humanitarian situations in the world”.
Perriello earlier warned the army that “the world is watching” as it stays away.
-Humanitarian access –
The talks are co-hosted by Saudi Arabia and Switzerland, with the African Union, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and the United Nations acting as a steering group.
Sudanese Media Minister Graham Abdelkader said ahead of the talks that the government was rejecting “any new observers or participants” — after Washington “insisted on the participation of the United Arab Emirates as an observer”.
The Sudanese army has repeatedly accused the UAE of backing the RSF — allegations the UAE denies.
Without the SAF, other attendees will press on with the talks’ agenda.
“Our focus is to move forward to achieve a cessation of hostilities, enhance humanitarian access and establish enforcement mechanisms that deliver concrete results,” Perriello said.
The brutal conflict has triggered one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.
The fighting has forced one in five people to flee their homes, while tens of thousands have died.
More than 25 million across the country — more than half its population — face acute hunger.
Related News
Shaqiri retires from international football
FG evacuates Nigerians in Sudan as expulsion deadline looms
Olorunleke waxes lyrical over Al-Merrikh unveiling
Vittorio Oppizzi, Sudan programme manager for the medical charity Doctors Without Borders (MSF), said both parties had “manipulated” humanitarian access, in violation of international law.
He told reporters MSF was well used to operating in conflict zones, and safe and unhindered access “should not be dependent on a cessation to hostility or a solution to the conflict”.
– Pressure on Burhan –
Alan Boswell, the Horn of Africa project director at the International Crisis Group, said Burhan was facing “serious internal divisions”, with some in his camp in favour of talks and others “fiercely opposed”.
Notably, with the United States in charge, and Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt present, “that puts all the main outside actors with leverage over the warring parties in one room together”, he told AFP.
The government no-show could leave Burhan under mounting external pressure if he is seen as “the main obstacle to ending the war”, said Boswell.
Previous talks in the Saudi city of Jeddah came to nothing.
Cameron Hudson, from the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Africa programme, told AFP that Washington had “tried to create the illusion of momentum” to force the army’s hand, “but it was a bluff and the SAF saw through it.”
“The only way to get them to talk is through brute force: either the risk of losing the war on the battlefield, the risk of real diplomatic isolation and the risk of real economic devastation for them. None of that pressure currently exists.”
– ‘Peace, now’ –
There has been no let-up in the fighting.
The Emergency Lawyers — a group of volunteer lawyers who have documented human rights violations during the war — reported “increased indiscriminate artillery shelling by the RSF on civilian areas” this week, particularly in El-Fasher and Omdurman, where they reported strikes on a school, a bus carrying civilian passengers and a hospital.
Around a hundred demonstrators gathered outside the UN headquarters in Geneva, chanting: “Action for Sudan” and holding a banner reading “Stop the catastrophic war”.
“We are not naive but this is critical now and they have to sit down and negotiate peace. We want peace now, ceasefire now,” co-organiser Lina Rasheed told AFP.
Amani Maghoub, who came especially from London, said: “The situation is so bad, we want the war to stop right now,” adding: “We want justice for the Sudanese.”
Comments
Post a Comment